OpenAI 2026 hackathon

stockd

AI-powered kitchen inventory management that turns grocery receipts into money saved.

Solo project by Kshitij Vatsa · 0 likes · 0 comments

View the project on Devpost

Archive position — measured, not model output

0 likes on Devpost

2,263 of the 7,850 archived projects have more likes, and 5,587 share exactly 0 — so this project's #6,965 place in the like-ranked listing is a tie-break inside that group, not a ranking.

Projects (log scale)

1
10
100
1k
10k
05,587
11,758
2284
3–4132
5–975
10+14

Likes on Devpost. ▲ marks this project's group.

Show the figures
LikesProjectsShare of archive
05,58771.2%
11,75822.4%
22843.6%
3–41321.7%
5–9751.0%
10+140.2%
Devpost like counts for all 7,850 archived projects, captured when this archive was built.

User Stories BotA demo video on every pull request

Get a demo video on every new feature

GitHub App that watches your pull requests and records a narrated, captioned demo.
Save time on demo prep and make informed decisions faster with a video walkthrough of every new feature.

Executive Summary

What the company appears to be

Stockd is a self-reported AI-powered kitchen inventory management tool that processes grocery receipts (from platforms like Blinkit, Zepto, Instamart, BigBasket) to build and maintain a pantry inventory. It claims to help users avoid waste, duplicate purchases, and save money by tracking expiry dates, suggesting recipes, and calculating potential savings.

What changed

The project was built as part of the OpenAI 2026 hackathon. It is described as a functional prototype with an anonymous demo showing nine historical orders and simulated household data. No commercial product or customer base is evidenced.

Single most important open question

Is there evidence of user adoption, revenue, or traction beyond the author’s own demonstration?

Back to contents

What The Product Actually Is

The description states that Stockd:

  • Processes screenshots of grocery orders
  • Extracts products, quantities, prices, and estimated shelf life using GPT-5.6
  • Presents this data for user review before adding it to the pantry
  • Maintains a live kitchen inventory
  • Highlights food nearing expiry
  • Tracks waste and its cost
  • Detects price changes between orders
  • Suggests recipes for expiring ingredients
  • Checks shopping-cart screenshots against pantry
  • Warns about duplicate purchases
  • Calculates potential money saved

It uses:

  • Next.js 15, TypeScript, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui
  • Supabase for auth and PostgreSQL for storage
  • Vercel for deployment
  • GPT-5.6 via OpenAI Responses API for perception and language tasks
  • Deterministic code for financial and inventory logic (e.g., unit conversion, expiry calculations)

Inference The product is described as a hybrid system combining AI for messy data interpretation with deterministic logic for financial and inventory decisions.

Back to contents

Positioning & Claim Evolution

The description states:

  • The idea came from the problem of buying groceries without remembering what’s at home
  • It aims to turn grocery receipts into money saved
  • It targets users who order groceries via quick-commerce platforms
  • It positions itself as a pantry that updates automatically from existing data (receipts)

Inference The positioning is centered on solving a common household inefficiency through automation and AI. The claim evolution appears to be: “If you already have receipts, we can make your kitchen smarter.”

Back to contents

Target Customer & ICP

The description states:

  • Users are those who order groceries via quick-commerce apps (Blinkit, Zepto, Instamart, BigBasket)
  • It assumes users already have grocery receipts on their phones
  • The demo simulates a household with specific items like ketchup, dal, and paneer

Inference The ICP appears to be tech-savvy individuals or households who use quick-commerce apps and are interested in reducing food waste and saving money.

Back to contents

Business Model & Pricing Evidence

Not evidenced.

The description does not mention any pricing model, monetization strategy, or commercial structure beyond the hackathon project.

Back to contents

Technical & Delivery Signals

The description states:

  • Built with Next.js 15, TypeScript, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui
  • Uses Supabase for authentication and PostgreSQL for storage
  • Vercel for deployment
  • GPT-5.6 via OpenAI Responses API for receipt parsing and language tasks
  • Zod schemas for structured model outputs
  • Deterministic logic for financial and inventory decisions
  • Codex used to accelerate development through six milestones

Inference The technical stack suggests a modern, scalable web app with AI integration. The hybrid approach (AI + deterministic logic) is described as intentional.

Back to contents

Traction & Maturity Signals

Not evidenced.

There is no mention of:

  • Users or customers
  • Revenue or monetization
  • Product usage metrics
  • Growth or retention data
  • Any commercial traction beyond the demo

The project is described as a hackathon submission with an anonymous demo.

Back to contents

Competitive Context

Not evidenced.

No information is provided about competitors, market size, or competitive positioning.

Back to contents

Open Questions & Risks

Open Question 1

No evidence of user adoption or commercial traction beyond the author’s own demo.

Open Question 2

The product is described as a hackathon project with no indication of ongoing development or product-market fit.

Open Question 3

The use of GPT-5.6 for receipt parsing implies reliance on an external AI service, which may not be scalable or cost-effective in the long term.

Open Question 4

No pricing model or monetization strategy is described — a key commercial element missing from a product that claims to save money.

Back to contents

Questions the description leaves open

  1. What is the actual user base or traction beyond the demo?
  2. How does the product plan to scale beyond a hackathon prototype?
  3. Is there any evidence of customer feedback or iteration?
  4. What is the monetization strategy, and how does it align with user value?
  5. Are there plans for data privacy compliance (e.g., handling grocery receipts)?
  6. How does the product handle edge cases in receipt parsing or product matching?

Back to contents

Overall Assessment

Not evidenced.

There is no evidence of:

  • Revenue
  • Customers
  • Traction
  • Financials
  • Market validation

The project is described as a hackathon submission with an anonymous demo and no commercial structure.

Confidence Low. This analysis is based entirely on the self-reported description provided by the author. No external verification or traction data is available.

Back to contents

User Stories BotA demo video on every pull request

Get a demo video on every new feature

GitHub App that watches your pull requests and records a narrated, captioned demo.
Save time on demo prep and make informed decisions faster with a video walkthrough of every new feature.

Source

Submitted to the OpenAI 2026 hackathon on Devpost. Project home on Devpost. Back to the full gallery on Devpost.

This competitive analysis was produced by top-founders.com (opens in a new tab)

Generated by a language model from this project's public Devpost page — its tagline, the author's own write-up and any built-with tags listed there — as captured in August 2026. Short quotations are the author's words. It is an opinion on the idea as a business, not on the people behind it, and it reflects the description as published then. If the project has moved on, request a correction below. The analysis is not independent research and contains no verified traction, revenue or customer data.

An independent guide by KFG International LLC — not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to Devpost or OpenAI.

Are you the author of this project? Request removal or a correction (support@kfginternational.com). Requests from authors are acted on within 48 hours, and in any case within seven days. Privacy notice.