OpenAI 2026 hackathon

Stock Open interest model trained

I am making a model who will predict stock predictions using their Open chain

Solo project by Mourya Ankit · 0 likes · 0 comments

Archive position — measured, not model output

0 likes on Devpost

2,264 of the 7,856 archived projects have more likes, and 5,592 share exactly 0 — so this project's #6,969 place in the like-ranked listing is a tie-break inside that group, not a ranking.

Projects (log scale)

1
10
100
1k
10k
05,592
11,758
2285
3–4132
5–975
10+14

Likes on Devpost. ▲ marks this project's group.

Show the figures
LikesProjectsShare of archive
05,59271.2%
11,75822.4%
22853.6%
3–41321.7%
5–9751.0%
10+140.2%
Devpost like counts for all 7,856 archived projects, captured when this archive was built.

Executive Summary

The description states that "Stock Open interest model trained" is a project built by one individual (Mourya Ankit) to predict stock movements using open interest data from options chains. The author claims to have achieved 46% accuracy with limited data and compute resources, and intends to expand the model to include minute-by-minute historical data for each strike price of each stock.

The project appears to be an early-stage algorithmic trading tool built as a hackathon submission. It is not evidenced to have any revenue, customers, or traction beyond the author's own claims. The single most important open question is whether this project has any commercial viability or potential for further development beyond its current prototype stage.

Back to contents

What The Product Actually Is

The description states that the project is "a model who will predict stock predictions using their Open chain". It is described as a quant algorithm trained on option chain data to provide accuracy in trading through mathematical benchmarks. The author built it using CUDA and Python, and claims to have achieved 46% accuracy with limited data.

Back to contents

Positioning & Claim Evolution

The description states that the project was inspired by personal financial losses, leading to an intent to build "an algorithm which will do automation and accuracy". It positions itself as a tool for trading prediction based on open interest data. The claim evolution shows a progression from personal motivation (losses) to technical implementation (algorithmic approach) to early results (46% accuracy).

Back to contents

Target Customer & ICP

Not evidenced. The description does not identify any specific customer segments or target users beyond the author's own personal use case.

Back to contents

Business Model & Pricing Evidence

Not evidenced. The description provides no information about pricing, monetization strategy, or business model.

Back to contents

Technical & Delivery Signals

The description states that the project was built with CUDA and Python. It claims to have achieved 46% accuracy with limited compute power and data. The author notes challenges with insufficient compute resources for training models. The project is described as a "quant algorithm" and mentions making a "lightweight and fast computing system with whole exact proper calculation".

Back to contents

Traction & Maturity Signals

Not evidenced. The description states that the project was submitted to a hackathon, but provides no evidence of revenue, customers, or adoption beyond the author's own claims.

Back to contents

Competitive Context

Not evidenced. The description does not mention any competitors or market context.

Back to contents

Key Risks & Red Flags

The description states that the author lacks sufficient compute power for model training, which may limit scalability. It also notes that the project is a single-person effort with no evidence of team expansion or institutional support. The claim of 46% accuracy with limited data raises questions about statistical significance and practical utility.

Back to contents

Diligence Questions To Ask The Founders

  1. What specific metrics define success for this model beyond 46% accuracy?
  2. How does the project plan to address the compute limitations mentioned?
  3. What is the intended path from prototype to commercial product?
  4. Are there any plans for data sourcing or partnerships with financial institutions?
  5. How will the model handle market volatility and changing conditions?

Back to contents

Investment/Partnership Verdict

Not evidenced. The description provides no information about funding, valuation, or partnership opportunities beyond the author's own claims.

Back to contents

Source

Submitted to the OpenAI 2026 hackathon on Devpost. Project home on DevPost.

The analysis above was generated by a language model from the project's own one-line description. It is not independent research and contains no verified traction, revenue or customer data.