Archive position — measured, not model output
0 likes on Devpost
2,264 of the 7,856 archived projects have more likes, and 5,592 share exactly 0 — so this project's #6,969 place in the like-ranked listing is a tie-break inside that group, not a ranking.
Projects (log scale)
Likes on Devpost. ▲ marks this project's group.
Show the figures
| Likes | Projects | Share of archive |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 5,592 | 71.2% |
| 1 | 1,758 | 22.4% |
| 2 | 285 | 3.6% |
| 3–4 | 132 | 1.7% |
| 5–9 | 75 | 1.0% |
| 10+ | 14 | 0.2% |
Executive Summary
The description states that "Stock Open interest model trained" is a project built by one individual (Mourya Ankit) to predict stock movements using open interest data from options chains. The author claims to have achieved 46% accuracy with limited data and compute resources, and intends to expand the model to include minute-by-minute historical data for each strike price of each stock.
The project appears to be an early-stage algorithmic trading tool built as a hackathon submission. It is not evidenced to have any revenue, customers, or traction beyond the author's own claims. The single most important open question is whether this project has any commercial viability or potential for further development beyond its current prototype stage.
What The Product Actually Is
The description states that the project is "a model who will predict stock predictions using their Open chain". It is described as a quant algorithm trained on option chain data to provide accuracy in trading through mathematical benchmarks. The author built it using CUDA and Python, and claims to have achieved 46% accuracy with limited data.
Positioning & Claim Evolution
The description states that the project was inspired by personal financial losses, leading to an intent to build "an algorithm which will do automation and accuracy". It positions itself as a tool for trading prediction based on open interest data. The claim evolution shows a progression from personal motivation (losses) to technical implementation (algorithmic approach) to early results (46% accuracy).
Target Customer & ICP
Not evidenced. The description does not identify any specific customer segments or target users beyond the author's own personal use case.
Business Model & Pricing Evidence
Not evidenced. The description provides no information about pricing, monetization strategy, or business model.
Technical & Delivery Signals
The description states that the project was built with CUDA and Python. It claims to have achieved 46% accuracy with limited compute power and data. The author notes challenges with insufficient compute resources for training models. The project is described as a "quant algorithm" and mentions making a "lightweight and fast computing system with whole exact proper calculation".
Traction & Maturity Signals
Not evidenced. The description states that the project was submitted to a hackathon, but provides no evidence of revenue, customers, or adoption beyond the author's own claims.
Competitive Context
Not evidenced. The description does not mention any competitors or market context.
Key Risks & Red Flags
The description states that the author lacks sufficient compute power for model training, which may limit scalability. It also notes that the project is a single-person effort with no evidence of team expansion or institutional support. The claim of 46% accuracy with limited data raises questions about statistical significance and practical utility.
Diligence Questions To Ask The Founders
- What specific metrics define success for this model beyond 46% accuracy?
- How does the project plan to address the compute limitations mentioned?
- What is the intended path from prototype to commercial product?
- Are there any plans for data sourcing or partnerships with financial institutions?
- How will the model handle market volatility and changing conditions?
Investment/Partnership Verdict
Not evidenced. The description provides no information about funding, valuation, or partnership opportunities beyond the author's own claims.
Source
Submitted to the OpenAI 2026 hackathon on Devpost. Project home on DevPost.
The analysis above was generated by a language model from the project's own one-line description. It is not independent research and contains no verified traction, revenue or customer data.

