Archive position — measured, not model output
1 like on Devpost
506 of the 7,856 archived projects have more likes, and 1,758 share exactly 1 — so this project's #1,418 place in the like-ranked listing is a tie-break inside that group, not a ranking.
Projects (log scale)
Likes on Devpost. ▲ marks this project's group.
Show the figures
| Likes | Projects | Share of archive |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 5,592 | 71.2% |
| 1 | 1,758 | 22.4% |
| 2 | 285 | 3.6% |
| 3–4 | 132 | 1.7% |
| 5–9 | 75 | 1.0% |
| 10+ | 14 | 0.2% |
Executive Summary
The description states that MATY is a "stateful ChatGPT" designed to help two humans reach an agreement, with a neutral AI acting as an intermediary. The product appears to be a web-based application built using OpenAI technologies and Next.js, submitted to the OpenAI 2026 hackathon. No evidence of revenue, customers, or traction is provided. The single most important open question is whether this project has progressed beyond prototype status and what its actual functionality is.
What The Product Actually Is
The description states that MATY is "Your stateful ChatGPT prepares your side. A neutral AI helps two humans reach an agreement." It is described as a web application built with Next.js, Supabase, React, TypeScript, and OpenAI technologies including Codex, GPT-5.6, MCP, and the OpenAI Apps SDK.
Positioning & Claim Evolution
The description states that MATY is positioned as a "stateful ChatGPT" that prepares users' sides for negotiations or agreements. The tagline suggests it acts as a neutral AI intermediary between two humans in a negotiation context. There is no evidence of prior positioning or evolution of claims beyond this single statement.
Target Customer & ICP
Not evidenced. The description does not specify target customers or ideal customer profiles (ICP). No information is provided about who would use this product or what their needs are.
Business Model & Pricing Evidence
Not evidenced. There is no mention of pricing, monetization strategy, or business model in the description. No evidence of revenue streams or customer acquisition costs is provided.
Technical & Delivery Signals
The description states that MATY was built with Next.js, Supabase, React, TypeScript, and OpenAI technologies including Codex, GPT-5.6, MCP, and the OpenAI Apps SDK. It was submitted to the OpenAI 2026 hackathon on Devpost. The author is listed as H Park, with a team size of one.
Traction & Maturity Signals
Not evidenced. There is no evidence of traction, adoption, or maturity beyond its submission to a hackathon. No data about user engagement, retention, or product usage is provided.
Competitive Context
Not evidenced. The description does not provide information about competitors or the competitive landscape in which this product operates.
Key Risks & Red Flags
The project appears to be a hackathon submission with no evidence of commercial traction or development beyond prototype stage. The lack of team size information and absence of any revenue or customer data raise questions about its viability as a business. The description does not indicate whether the product has been tested in real-world scenarios or if it is intended for commercial deployment.
Diligence Questions To Ask The Founders
- What specific problem does MATY solve, and how does it differ from existing negotiation tools?
- Has the product been tested with actual users beyond the hackathon setting?
- What is the plan for moving from prototype to a scalable product or service?
- How will the neutral AI component be trained to maintain impartiality in negotiations?
- What are the technical limitations of the current implementation and how might they be addressed?
Investment/Partnership Verdict
Not evidenced. There is insufficient information to assess whether this project warrants investment or partnership consideration. The description lacks evidence of product-market fit, traction, or commercial viability.
Source
Submitted to the OpenAI 2026 hackathon on Devpost. Project home on DevPost.
The analysis above was generated by a language model from the project's own one-line description. It is not independent research and contains no verified traction, revenue or customer data.