Ecliptic

The description states that Ecliptic is a presentation platform that allows users to:

• Write or paste content into a "Brief" (document-like editor).
• Add media (images, SVGs, videos, charts) directly within the narrative.
• Define creative direction in a "Style Kit".
• Generate a presentation using GPT-5.6 for narrative and scene planning.
• Review and edit the output in a "Canvas" interface.
• Publish a shareable URL of the final presentation.

It is described as not forced into a fixed number of slides, but rather expanding based on input material, with every source block assigned to a scene to prevent loss of content. The visual system is called “Elio”, combining keynote-style clarity with bold typography and dynamic animation using Anime.js and Three.js.

Inference The product appears to be an AI-assisted, code-native presentation tool, built for creators who want more than static slides but are not necessarily professional designers or developers. It uses modern web technologies (React, WebGL, Cloudflare Workers) and integrates AI at the semantic and creative direction layer.

The author states that Ecliptic was inspired by a desire to bridge the gap between traditional slide-based presentations and interactive web experiences. The platform is positioned as:

• A web-native presentation tool, not constrained by PowerPoint or Keynote.
• A code-native experience, leveraging modern frontend libraries and AI for creative direction.
• An end-to-end workflow from idea to published presentation.

The author also claims that Ecliptic’s approach differs from existing tools in that it:

• Uses the same primitives as modern web experiences (animation, 3D, shaders).
• Gives AI the structure it needs to help create presentations end-to-end.
• Avoids leaving the presentation tool to rebuild interactive content in motion design software.

Inference Ecliptic positions itself as a next-generation presentation platform, targeting creators who want cinematic, dynamic presentations but without needing to leave their authoring environment. It is not positioned as a replacement for PowerPoint or Keynote, but rather as an alternative that leverages modern web and AI capabilities.

The description does not explicitly state the target customer or ICP (Ideal Customer Profile). However, it implies:

• Creators who want to build interactive presentations beyond static slides.
• Users who are comfortable with document-like editing, but want more visual impact.
• Developers or designers who may be interested in a code-native tool that uses modern web technologies.

The author notes that the system is built for those who want “more than static slides” and are not necessarily professional designers. The product is described as being built from the perspective of someone with a background in web design and development, suggesting an early-stage audience of technical creators or early adopters.

Inference The ICP likely includes technical creators, developers, and content creators who want to build visually rich presentations without leaving their web-based workflow. It is not yet clear if there’s a defined segment beyond the author's own use case.

There is no evidence in the description of any business model or pricing structure. The author does not mention:

• Revenue streams
• Subscription tiers
• Freemium offerings
• Licensing models
• Paid features or usage limits

The project is described as a personal hackathon submission, built by one person, with no indication of monetization.

Inference No business model or pricing evidence is provided. The product is not yet commercialized.

The author states that Ecliptic is built using:

• Frontend: React 19, TypeScript, Vite, Tiptap (editor), Anime.js (animation), Three.js (3D), WebGL
• Backend: Cloudflare Workers, D1 (database), R2 (storage), Workflows (orchestration)
• AI Integration: GPT-5.6 for narrative planning and creative direction

The system is described as:

• Using a deterministic compiler to convert AI-generated plans into reliable presentation choreography.
• Having source coverage contracts to ensure all input material is used.
• Supporting presenter controls, speaker notes, and rehearsal features.

Inference Ecliptic is built with modern web stack and cloud infrastructure. It uses a hybrid approach combining AI for creative direction and deterministic compilation for execution. The architecture suggests an emphasis on reliability and control over presentation behavior, not just generation.

The description states that Ecliptic was submitted to the OpenAI 2026 hackathon and is a personal project built by one developer (jyhl Lee). There is no evidence of:

• Revenue
• Customers
• User feedback or adoption
• Product usage metrics
• Market traction

The author notes that the first version was technically impressive but creatively unsuccessful, and that they had to rebuild it multiple times. This suggests a highly experimental and early-stage product.

Inference There is no evidence of traction or maturity beyond the author’s own development work. The project is described as a personal hackathon submission, not yet a commercialized product.

The description does not mention any direct competitors. It implies that existing presentation tools (e.g., PowerPoint, Keynote) are limited in their ability to create interactive experiences, and that Ecliptic aims to bridge this gap using web technologies and AI.

It is described as being different from traditional slide-based tools, but no comparison with specific products or platforms is made.

Inference The competitive landscape is not clearly defined. The author positions Ecliptic as a novel approach to presentation creation, but does not name or analyze existing alternatives.

• No traction or revenue: The product is described as a hackathon submission with no evidence of adoption or monetization.
• Single-person development: The entire project was built by one person, raising questions about scalability and long-term maintenance.
• Unproven market fit: The author notes that early versions were creatively unsuccessful, suggesting the product may not yet have validated its core thesis.
• AI dependency: Heavy reliance on GPT-5.6 for creative direction raises concerns about:
  • Model availability
  • Cost of AI usage
  • Reliability of AI outputs
• Lack of user feedback or testing: No mention of user interviews, beta testing, or feedback loops.

Inference Ecliptic is a highly experimental and unproven concept, with no evidence of commercial viability or market traction. The product is in an early stage of development and may not yet have validated its value proposition.

1. What specific user problems are you solving, and how do you know?
2. Have you tested Ecliptic with real users beyond yourself? If so, what feedback did you get?
3. How do you plan to monetize this product? Is there a business model in mind?
4. What is your roadmap for expanding beyond the current visual style (Elio)?
5. Are there any technical or AI-related dependencies that could become problematic at scale?
6. How do you plan to ensure consistent quality of AI-generated content?
7. What are the key assumptions underlying your product approach, and how have they been tested?