OpenAI 2026 hackathon

EchoScan

Echo Scan is a bat-inspired Android app that uses high-frequency audio chirps and echo correlation to detect nearby objects and estimate distances up to 50 cm.

Solo project by You Apps · 0 likes · 0 comments

Archive position — measured, not model output

0 likes on Devpost

2,264 of the 7,856 archived projects have more likes, and 5,592 share exactly 0 — so this project's #3,865 place in the like-ranked listing is a tie-break inside that group, not a ranking.

Projects (log scale)

1
10
100
1k
10k
05,592
11,758
2285
3–4132
5–975
10+14

Likes on Devpost. ▲ marks this project's group.

Show the figures
LikesProjectsShare of archive
05,59271.2%
11,75822.4%
22853.6%
3–41321.7%
5–9751.0%
10+140.2%
Devpost like counts for all 7,856 archived projects, captured when this archive was built.

Executive Summary

What the company appears to be

EchoScan is a self-reported Android app that uses high-frequency audio chirps and echo correlation to detect nearby objects and estimate distances up to 50 cm. It was built as part of an OpenAI hackathon project by a single developer team, You Apps.

What changed

The author states this is a proof-of-concept built in a short timeframe (a "Build Week") using AI collaboration tools like GPT-5.6 and Codex. No commercial or product development beyond MVP exists.

Single most important open question

Is there any evidence of real-world usage, customer feedback, revenue, or traction that would suggest this is more than a prototype?

Back to contents

What The Product Actually Is

The description states that EchoScan is an Android app that emits high-frequency audio chirps (30 ms, 14–18 kHz Hann-windowed) and uses echo correlation to detect objects within 50 cm. It processes the audio locally using cross-correlation between the emitted signal and the returning echo to determine object presence, approximate distance, and confidence level.

It is described as a biomimetic sonar system inspired by bat echolocation, built natively for Android with Kotlin and Jetpack Compose.

Evidence The author’s own write-up describes how it works technically, including use of AudioTrack/AudioRecord for full-duplex audio, cross-correlation algorithm, and distance calculation using speed of sound.

Inference This is a software-based sonar system that relies on smartphone hardware to simulate echolocation. It does not appear to be a commercial product or service yet.

Back to contents

Positioning & Claim Evolution

The author claims the app turns a standard Android phone into a short-range acoustic detector, leveraging AI and advanced signal processing to achieve spatial sensing without specialized hardware.

It positions itself as an experiment in biomimetic sonar using everyday mobile devices, inspired by WiFi-based wall-seeing experiments and AI-assisted development.

Evidence The write-up states the inspiration came from watching a video about seeing through walls with WiFi waves, leading to the idea of building something similar using smartphone sensors.

Inference The positioning is experimental and exploratory. It does not claim commercial viability or widespread adoption.

Back to contents

Target Customer & ICP

Not evidenced.

The description does not identify any specific customer segment or target market beyond a general interest in accessibility or spatial sensing technology.

Evidence No mention of end users, personas, or use cases beyond the MVP demonstration.

Back to contents

Business Model & Pricing Evidence

Not evidenced.

There is no indication of pricing, monetization strategy, or business model. The project is described as a hackathon submission with no commercial intent or revenue streams mentioned.

Evidence The write-up focuses on technical implementation and AI collaboration; no mention of sales, subscriptions, licensing, or any form of monetization.

Back to contents

Technical & Delivery Signals

The app was built natively for Android using Kotlin, Jetpack Compose, and a clean architecture with domain/data/ui separation. It uses AudioTrack and AudioRecord to bypass standard audio processing and implements full-duplex audio pipelines.

It includes deterministic chirp generation, PCM manipulation utilities, cross-correlation logic, and UI states designed around the acoustic engine’s output.

The AI (GPT-5.6 and Codex) was used for scaffolding, code writing, algorithm design, and testing, acting as a pair programmer throughout development.

Evidence The author describes the technical stack and workflow in detail, including challenges like direct coupling and near-field dead zones.

Inference The app is technically sophisticated for a hackathon project but remains an MVP with no production deployment or scalability claims.

Back to contents

Traction & Maturity Signals

Not evidenced.

There is no evidence of user adoption, customer feedback, usage metrics, or product maturity beyond the initial build week. No data on downloads, retention, or real-world performance is provided.

Evidence The project was submitted to a hackathon and described as an MVP with no follow-up or commercial rollout.

Back to contents

Competitive Context

Not evidenced.

No information is given about existing competitors or similar technologies in the market. The description does not reference other sonar systems, accessibility tools, or spatial sensing solutions.

Evidence No mention of prior art or competitive landscape.

Back to contents

Key Risks & Red Flags

  • Prototype-only: The project is described as a hackathon MVP with no evidence of further development or commercialization.
  • No traction or customers: There is no indication that the app has been used by anyone beyond its creator.
  • AI dependency: Heavy reliance on AI tools (GPT-5.6, Codex) raises questions about whether this could be replicated without such tools or if it’s a one-off experiment.
  • Hardware limitations: The system depends heavily on Android device audio capabilities, which vary widely across models and may not support consistent performance.

Evidence The author explicitly states the project is an MVP built in a short time and submitted to a hackathon.

Back to contents

Diligence Questions To Ask The Founders

  1. Has the app been tested on multiple devices beyond the OnePlus 3T used for calibration?
  2. Are there any plans or early signs of commercialization or product development beyond this MVP?
  3. What is the current status of the AI collaboration — is it still actively involved in development, or was it only used during the hackathon?
  4. Have you considered how to scale this across different Android hardware profiles and latencies?
  5. Is there any feedback from users or accessibility communities who might benefit from such a tool?

Back to contents

Investment/Partnership Verdict

Not evidenced.

There is no evidence of revenue, customers, traction, or commercial viability beyond the hackathon submission. The project appears to be an experimental prototype with no indication of future development or market readiness.

Evidence The author describes it as a short-term experiment, not a product or business.

Inference At this stage, there is insufficient evidence to support investment or partnership interest. Any potential value would depend on whether the team continues development and demonstrates real-world utility or traction.

Back to contents

Source

Submitted to the OpenAI 2026 hackathon on Devpost. Project home on DevPost.

The analysis above was generated by a language model from the project's own one-line description. It is not independent research and contains no verified traction, revenue or customer data.