OpenAI 2026 hackathon

Retention Radar

Turn customer warning signs into clear retention actions.

Solo project by Deepak Kushwaha · 1 likes · 0 comments

Archive position — measured, not model output

1 like on Devpost

506 of the 7,856 archived projects have more likes, and 1,758 share exactly 1 — so this project's #1,821 place in the like-ranked listing is a tie-break inside that group, not a ranking.

Projects (log scale)

1
10
100
1k
10k
05,592
11,758
2285
3–4132
5–975
10+14

Likes on Devpost. ▲ marks this project's group.

Show the figures
LikesProjectsShare of archive
05,59271.2%
11,75822.4%
22853.6%
3–41321.7%
5–9751.0%
10+140.2%
Devpost like counts for all 7,856 archived projects, captured when this archive was built.

Executive Summary

What the company appears to be

Retention Radar is a self-reported project submitted to the OpenAI 2026 hackathon. The description states it aims to "turn customer warning signs into clear retention actions" using machine learning techniques, including gradient-boosted trees and xgboost.

What changed

There is no evidence of prior version or evolution — this appears to be a new project submitted for a hackathon.

The single most important open question

Is there any evidence of actual customer adoption, revenue, or product-market fit beyond the hackathon submission?

Analysis basis

This report is based entirely on the self-reported, unverified description supplied by the caller. No archived history, third-party data, or independent verification is available. All claims are from the author's own write-up and must be treated as stated, not proven.

Back to contents

What The Product Actually Is

The description states that Retention Radar is a product that "turns customer warning signs into clear retention actions." It was built for the OpenAI 2026 hackathon using technologies including:

  • gboost (gradient-boosted trees)
  • groupkfold
  • isotonicregression
  • machine learning
  • numpy, pandas, python
  • roc/pr-auc
  • sql
  • xgboost

Inference The product appears to be a machine learning-based tool for identifying customer churn risk signals and generating actionable insights. However, the description does not specify whether it is a SaaS platform, an API, or a data analysis tool.

Evidence strength Based on self-reported information only. No demonstration, usage examples, or technical architecture provided.

Back to contents

Positioning & Claim Evolution

The tagline states: “Turn customer warning signs into clear retention actions.”

Claim

The product positions itself as a solution to help businesses identify early signs of customer attrition and act on them proactively.

There is no evidence of prior positioning, evolution, or market feedback. The project was submitted to a hackathon, suggesting it may be in an early stage of development or conceptualization.

Evidence strength Based on self-reported tagline only. No prior claims, marketing materials, or product evolution documented.

Back to contents

Target Customer & ICP

The description does not specify the target customer or ideal customer profile (ICP). It implies a general use case for identifying customer churn risk but does not name industries, company sizes, or user roles.

Evidence strength Not evidenced. No mention of specific customer segments, personas, or use cases.

Back to contents

Business Model & Pricing Evidence

There is no evidence of pricing, monetization strategy, or business model in the description. The project was submitted to a hackathon and lacks any indication of commercial viability or revenue streams.

Evidence strength Not evidenced. No information on how the product would be sold or priced.

Back to contents

Technical & Delivery Signals

The author lists the following technologies used:

  • gboost (gradient-boosted trees)
  • groupkfold
  • isotonicregression
  • machine learning
  • numpy, pandas, python
  • roc/pr-auc
  • sql
  • xgboost

Inference The product likely uses machine learning models for predictive analytics, possibly in a Python-based environment with SQL for data handling.

Evidence strength Based on self-reported tech stack. No evidence of deployment, scalability, or delivery mechanism.

Back to contents

Traction & Maturity Signals

The project was submitted to the OpenAI 2026 hackathon and has no documented traction beyond that.

Inference The product is likely in a very early stage — possibly conceptual or prototype-level — with no evidence of customer adoption, revenue, or market validation.

Evidence strength Not evidenced. No signs of product-market fit, user base, or commercial activity.

Back to contents

Competitive Context

There is no mention of competitors or competitive positioning in the description. The project does not reference existing tools for churn prediction or retention management.

Evidence strength Not evidenced. No competitive landscape or differentiation described.

Back to contents

Key Risks & Red Flags

  • No traction or revenue evidence: The product has only been submitted to a hackathon.
  • No customer validation: There is no indication of real-world use or feedback.
  • Unproven business model: No pricing, monetization, or commercial strategy provided.
  • Limited team size: Only one team member is listed.
  • Self-reported only: All claims are unverified and lack corroboration.

Evidence strength Based on absence of evidence. These are inferred risks from the lack of any substantive data.

Back to contents

Diligence Questions To Ask The Founders

  1. What specific customer pain points does Retention Radar aim to solve?
  2. How is the product currently being tested or validated (if at all)?
  3. Is there a plan for monetization or commercial deployment?
  4. What are the key assumptions about the market and user behavior?
  5. Are there any early adopters or pilot customers?
  6. What is the roadmap for development beyond this hackathon submission?

Note

These questions are based on the lack of evidence in the description.

Back to contents

Investment/Partnership Verdict

Verdict Not evidenced. The project is described as a hackathon submission with no evidence of traction, revenue, or market fit. It is not clear whether Retention Radar has moved beyond concept stage or if it has any commercial viability.

Confidence level Low. This analysis is based entirely on self-reported information and lacks any corroboration or historical data.

Back to contents

Source

Submitted to the OpenAI 2026 hackathon on Devpost. Project home on DevPost.

The analysis above was generated by a language model from the project's own one-line description. It is not independent research and contains no verified traction, revenue or customer data.