OpenAI 2026 hackathon

Naventora — AI Business Operating System

One AI command connects sales, marketing, finance and operations, finds cross-business constraints, prepares coordinated actions, simulates impact and keeps humans in control.

Solo project by Armandas Tiškevičius · 0 likes · 0 comments

Archive position — measured, not model output

0 likes on Devpost

2,264 of the 7,856 archived projects have more likes, and 5,592 share exactly 0 — so this project's #5,487 place in the like-ranked listing is a tie-break inside that group, not a ranking.

Projects (log scale)

1
10
100
1k
10k
05,592
11,758
2285
3–4132
5–975
10+14

Likes on Devpost. ▲ marks this project's group.

Show the figures
LikesProjectsShare of archive
05,59271.2%
11,75822.4%
22853.6%
3–41321.7%
5–9751.0%
10+140.2%
Devpost like counts for all 7,856 archived projects, captured when this archive was built.

Executive Summary

What the company appears to be

Naventora is described as an AI Business Operating System for small and growing businesses. The author states it connects sales, marketing, finance, inventory and operations into one shared business context, using an AI Director that analyzes evidence across modules, prepares coordinated actions, and simulates impact — all while keeping human control over decisions.

What changed

The project was developed during the OpenAI Build Week hackathon. The author focused on creating a new AI Experience layer to demonstrate how Naventora coordinates business functions through a synthetic demo company. This involved building an Experience Engine, Business Decision Graph, and Business Digital Twin, with human approval workflows and narration synchronized to interface scenes.

The single most important open question

Is there evidence of real traction or early adoption by small businesses, or any proof that the described AI system works beyond a demonstration?

Back to contents

What The Product Actually Is

The description states that Naventora is an AI Business Operating System for small and growing businesses. It connects multiple business domains — sales, marketing, finance, inventory, and operations — into one shared context.

It includes:

  • An AI Director (GPT-5.6) that analyzes evidence from different modules
  • A Business Decision Graph to show causal chains and prioritized actions
  • A Business Digital Twin for simulating future states based on selected decisions
  • A Human approval workflow, where no automated action is taken without human review
  • An Experience Engine that orchestrates scenarios and presents them in a public demo

The system is described as not just providing general advice but analyzing cross-module business constraints, preparing coordinated actions, and simulating impacts.

The description states: “Naventora connects sales, marketing, finance, inventory and operations into one shared business context.”

The description states: “A normal dashboard would show these as separate problems. Naventora connects them into one business story.”

The description states: “The AI Director then analyzes evidence from several areas of the company instead of answering only from one module.”

The description states: “Nothing is published, purchased or changed automatically without human approval.”

The description states: “Naventora does not use AI only as a decorative chat window. The AI Director works across several business domains, connects evidence, explains the main constraint and prepares coordinated work.”

Back to contents

Positioning & Claim Evolution

The author positions Naventora as an AI Business Operating System that helps small business owners understand their business holistically, decide what to do next, and stay in control.

It is described as:

  • Not a chatbot giving generic advice
  • A system that understands the whole business
  • Capable of connecting scattered data across modules
  • Designed to prepare real actions while keeping humans in control

The claim evolution shows a shift from a general idea (helping small businesses) to a specific product concept (AI Director coordinating business functions), with emphasis on:

  • Cross-module integration
  • Human-in-the-loop decision-making
  • Simulated impact projections

The description states: “I did not want to build another chatbot that only gives general advice. I wanted to build an AI system that could understand the whole business, connect the evidence and help an owner prepare real actions while still keeping the final decision in human hands.”

The description states: “Naventora does not see isolated dashboards. It sees the business as one connected system.”

The description states: “The first version was not good enough... I decided not to hide those problems with video editing. Instead, I redesigned the experience.”

Back to contents

Target Customer & ICP

The author identifies small and growing businesses as the primary target.

These are described as:

  • Expected to manage marketing, sales, customers, finances, and daily operations
  • Often using disconnected tools
  • Not having access to large budgets or separate experts for different business functions

The product is positioned to solve a problem of business visibility, where information exists but is scattered across systems.

The description states: “Small business owners are expected to manage marketing, sales, customers, finances, and daily operations, often while using several disconnected tools.”

The description states: “Unlike large companies, they usually do not have investors, large budgets, or the ability to hire separate experts for marketing, finance, and sales.”

The description states: “My next steps are: Connect the Experience Engine to live, authorized company data.”

Back to contents

Business Model & Pricing Evidence

Not evidenced.

The description does not mention any pricing model, revenue streams, customer acquisition strategies, or monetization plans.

No evidence of business model or pricing.

Back to contents

Technical & Delivery Signals

The author reports building a new Experience Engine layer within an existing architecture. Key technical components include:

  • GPT-5.6 AI Director
  • Marketing, Sales, Finance and Operations adapters
  • Business Decision Graph
  • Business Digital Twin simulation
  • Human approval workflow
  • Public-demo security and abuse protection
  • Narration synchronized with interface using OpenAI Text-to-Speech (Cedar voice)
  • Use of Codex for engineering audit

The system uses:

  • Next.js, Node.js, React, PostgreSQL, Prisma, TypeScript, Cloudflare, OpenAI APIs, etc.

The description states: “I built the Experience Engine as a separate layer inside the existing Naventora architecture.”

The description states: “GPT-5.6 receives information from Marketing, Sales, Finance and Operations and produces: A cross-module diagnosis, a causal chain, prioritized actions, an explanation of why each action matters.”

The description states: “I used Codex for the final engineering audit of the Build Week experience.”

The description states: “The public demo uses isolated synthetic sessions. It does not access real customer companies, spend money, publish marketing content or trigger real integrations.”

Back to contents

Traction & Maturity Signals

Not evidenced.

There is no mention of:

  • Revenue
  • Customers
  • Adoption
  • Product usage metrics
  • Live integrations
  • Market traction beyond the demo

No evidence of traction or maturity.

Back to contents

Competitive Context

Not evidenced.

The description does not reference competitors, market size, or competitive positioning.

No evidence of competitive context.

Back to contents

Key Risks & Red Flags

  1. Unproven AI system: The product is described as a demonstration and not yet connected to live data.
  2. Single-founder project: Only one team member is listed (Armandas Tiškevičius).
  3. No revenue or customer evidence: No proof of traction, adoption, or monetization.
  4. Demo-only architecture: The system works in synthetic sessions and not with real business data yet.
  5. Unverified claims: All statements are self-reported and unverified.

The description states: “Naventora already existed before Build Week as a larger modular business platform.”

The description states: “The public demo uses isolated synthetic sessions. It does not access real customer companies, spend money, publish marketing content or trigger real integrations.”

The description states: “My next steps are: Connect the Experience Engine to live, authorized company data.”

Back to contents

Diligence Questions To Ask The Founders

  1. What is the current architecture of Naventora outside of the Build Week demo?
  2. Has the AI Director been tested with real business data or only synthetic scenarios?
  3. How does the system handle integration with existing tools used by small businesses?
  4. What are the plans for monetization and customer acquisition?
  5. Are there any early adopters or pilot customers?
  6. How is human approval enforced in practice, especially for consequential actions?
  7. What are the technical challenges in scaling this to multiple business types?

Back to contents

Investment/Partnership Verdict

Not evidenced.

There is no evidence of:

  • Revenue
  • Customers
  • Product-market fit
  • Financials
  • Team traction or prior experience
  • Market validation

The project is described as a demo and not yet connected to live data. The author states that the next steps include connecting to real company data, which suggests the product is not yet ready for investment or partnership.

The description states: “My next steps are: Connect the Experience Engine to live, authorized company data.”

The description states: “My long-term goal is to make Naventora an AI Business Operating System that helps small business owners understand what is happening, decide what to do next and stay in control.”

The description states: “This project was submitted to the OpenAI 2026 hackathon on Devpost.”

Back to contents

Source

Submitted to the OpenAI 2026 hackathon on Devpost. Project home on DevPost.

The analysis above was generated by a language model from the project's own one-line description. It is not independent research and contains no verified traction, revenue or customer data.